-
LoCo Food Distribution is helping the environment
By: Emmalee Krieg
Fort Collins, Colo. — Distribution is inevitable. We hardly think about one item we buy and the complicated chain that stretches through different continents and resources to land in our lap.
Fort Collins is no exception in these extensive supply chains, however, we can further examine some of the initiatives and progress along the way.
Fort Collins does have a considerable amount of local businesses that prioritize local sourcing of goods such as food. This includes LoCo Food Distribution which offers, “Colorado retail establishments an easy way to offer products from local growers, ranchers and manufacturers.”
LoCo Foods currently deliver local items to grocery stores, independent retailers, and institutions from Fort Collins, all the way down to Colorado Springs. This sustains small businesses and institutions in our community by delivering goods and creating jobs. Moreover, it lessens carbon emissions. By keeping our distribution of goods within one state, there is less traveling with fewer vehicles. It also reinforces the jobs of local farmers.
Restaurants that choose to source locally in Fort Collins such as Spoons, partner with local farms. They locally source a lot of their ingredients, “working closely with a variety of Colorado farms whose values align with our own, which is to serve only the cleanest and freshest produce.”
Buying local produce has a positive effect on our carbon footprints. According to Columbia Climate School, buying food locally could, “ reduce the average consumer’s greenhouse gas emissions by four to five percent at best.”
While there’s a whole lot more that goes into reducing our carbon footprint than just buying locally, having places that source from these institutions for better distribution is a good start for the environment.
-
Food Distribution Alternative: the Growing Project
By: Macy Kramer
Fort Collins, Colo. — In Fort Collins, Colorado, the distribution of food has caused a massive uptake in protests and community events to propose alternatives to the current methods of food distribution. The importance of more environmentally friendly options for distribution is explained in both Annie Leonard’s, “The Story of Stuff” as well as, “A case analysis of a sustainable food supply chain distribution system” by Validi, Sahar; Bhattacharya, Arijit; Byrne, P.J. Leonard. The article describes the importance of better methods by explaining how bad the current methods are.
Leonard focuses less on food, and more on big companies like Amazon, Walmart, and H&M, going over the amount of environmental damage caused by those companies shipping using semi-trucks and container ships, the amount of fuel and energy they use is increasing constantly.
In Fort Collins and surrounding areas, most notably Denver, there are plans in place to better the shipment methods of food products and household products.
The Fort Collins community has come up with, “The Growing Project”, an initiative that promotes an environmentally and socially just local food system through direct agricultural experiences, education, community building, economic opportunities, and advocacy.
The Growing Project aims to protect our environment and provide alternative methods to what is currently used in distribution, with a tagline of, “Food, People, Justice” — they are not only helping the environment, but also the people.
One of the most interesting parts of their community, is the commons garden, a garden open to all that includes information on how to grow your own food, as well as provides food for local Fort Collins residents, reducing people’s impact on the environment by removing the need for trucks and boats to deliver the food, and only requires someone to walk to the garden to get their produce. Their Commons garden is not only beautiful but resourceful to reduce global Carbon Dioxide emissions and energy consumption.
-
LoCo for FoCo: Local Food Distribution & Why Larger Suppliers Are Taking A Backseat
By: Darcy Keown
Fort Collins, Colo. — LoCo food distribution is a company that has worked for over ten years to streamline the process of local food sourcing in Colorado. LoCo Foods not only helps retail establishments offer local food from growers and ranchers, but it also helps said growers, ranchers, and manufacturers reach wholesale buyers in the state of Colorado.In delivering locally grown and processed foods to restaurants, grocery stores, and other businesses along the front range, the Fort Collins-based company is actively strengthening the connection between producer and purchaser so that Fort Collins has access to the finest produce.
Most global and national food distribution companies have one goal: to sell the cheapest low-quality products (at a high volume) as fast as possible. This is the kind of ‘convenient’ produce you’re most likely to find at your nearest grocery, and you may not be surprised to discover that a large portion of that produce is thrown away.
● Supermarkets are responsible for 10% of food waste, and up to 40% of food in the US is lost from farm to fork (Natural Resources Defense Council)
● More than 29 million Americans live in neighborhoods where they cannot buy healthy food to feed their families (USDA Economic Research Service)On the flip side, LoCo encapsulates both healthy food and local economic development. Not only does local food distribution bring more attention to local farmers and their produce, but it also helps with larger-scale issues of global competition.
According to Navigating Impact, global competition has led to extreme consolidation and geographic concentration of both agricultural production and distribution–which in turn has placed a limit on employment opportunities–and raised the demand for low-wage labor.
In the last few years, LoCo has moved four million dollars worth of products within the Colorado Front Range region. According to CNote, that included a hefty number of new jobs and millions of dollars kept in the local economy. Additionally, buying local food reduces food waste, because it reduces the amount of phases that some fresh produce goes through to get to your table.
Now, more than ever, Colorado consumers are focusing on buying healthier produce. Why should consumers pay for cheap produce that only supports big companies, and not grocery store workers or growers, when they could pay for quality, locally sourced ingredients, and have their purchase benefit growers and producers in their community?
Elizabeth Mozer, founder, and CEO of LoCo food distribution, strives to cater to the people. It’s hard work, distributing locally produced foods throughout the 400-mile radius around Fort Collins, but to Elizabeth, the impact it makes is worth it.
-
The Distribution of Goods to Fort Collins
By: Mark Eyerman
Fort Collins, Colo. — Last year, Amazon made over 225 billion dollars in gross profit. They did this primarily through their online shipping and retailing business. This much profit means that Amazon must be able to ship over a million packages a day.
To do this, they use distribution centers to help get their products to their customers. Currently, Amazon is building a 600,000-acre distribution facility in Loveland in order to help increase their delivery times to customers in Colorado and increase their investment in the state as a whole.
From an environmental perspective, this is a positive change because it will decrease the impact that local consumers have on the Earth. A study referenced in The Story of Stuff, a book about how the production cycle can hurt the environment, found that “online shopping was more efficient and sustainable in terms of energy used, conventional air pollutants generated, waste generated, and greenhouse gas emissions.”
Given the fact that this distribution center will encourage online shopping, it can be said that this center is ultimately an environmental good as it will decrease the impact consumers have on the environment.
This belief is further corroborated by a thesis done on the comparative environmental effects of online shopping vs. brick-and-mortar locations.This thesis states: “Online shopping tends to have a better environmental impact than traditional shopping.” This illustrates how Amazon’s new distribution and fulfillment center in Loveland could actually have a largely positive impact on the environment because it will increase the amount consumers buy online as opposed to shopping in person.
This construction has been welcomed by the local community. According to an article by the Coloradoan, “Loveland Mayor Jacki Marsh called Amazon’s investment in the city ‘transformative’ and One of the largest economic development projects Loveland has ever seen.” Alongside lessening the environmental impacts of consumerism, this warehouse can also be seen as providing thousands of jobs and boosting the local economy.
Ultimately, the distribution of goods can hurt the environment. This can be through greenhouse gas emissions and other waste produced. The Amazon fulfillment and distribution center being built near Fort Collins will ultimately lower this impact by encouraging consumers to shop online; a process that is ultimately less harmful to the environment than shopping at a brick-and-mortar store. Also, this warehouse will increase jobs in the surrounding area and provide an economic boost to Colorado as a whole.
-
Distribution in E-Commerce Section
By: Aidan Eure
Fort Collins, Colo. — Distribution is the method of transporting goods and services throughout the world. In today’s economy, goods are transported globally by transportation induing aircraft, intercontinental ships, trucks, and trains. Most of these distribution methods require fossil fuels as a source of fuel which contributes to global warming and resource depletion.
Distribution becomes even less sustainable when considering outsourcing. Outsourcing is prevalent in countries with few regulations that house cheap labor; this allows companies to build products for cheap worldwide with little to no environmental regulation.
Outsourcing also becomes more damaging when considering the distance products must travel to end up in the hands of a buyer. The chapter also analyses the impact of large corporations like Amazon, Walmart, and other superstores by looking at their energy consumption, distribution methods, and use of technology.
During Leonard’s explanation of superstores and online shopping, she argues the pros and cons of shopping online on Amazon v.s. shopping in a store such as Walmart. The results of a research project, Leonard states, “The study found that online shopping was more efficient and sustainable in terms of energy used, conventional air pollutants generated, waste generated, and greenhouse gas emissions.”
With this result, there is evidence that major online shopping giants like Amazon output massive emissions. While Leonard might say shopping online is more sustainable, it is in no way a clean practice in its current form.
The issue of e-commerce primarily falls into the 34 crises of the environment due to its effect on climate change. Companies like Amazon consistently push carbon emissions into the air by transporting goods, putting products through fulfillment centers, and outsourcing products to different countries.
The most recent published data on Amazon’s environmental impact has revealed that in 2021 the company generated 71.54 million tons of carbon emissions through external and internal operations. Forbes reported that Amazon was initially reluctant to publish its complete emission report due to its abnormally high carbon rate.
The total emissions an online store or distributer produces are linked to the rising popularity of online shopping, creating a demand for more sources of transportation and processing. For example, it was expected that Amazon had such a high increase in carbon emissions compared to past years in 2021 due to the pandemic and the danger of shopping in physical stores.
In a Bloomberg CityLab article, it stated that “It’s estimated that, on average, every person in the U.S. generates demand for roughly 60 tons of freight each year, according to the National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board.”
Many cities have also taken notice of the demand for e-commerce as they are now overrun by delivery vehicles that generate more pollution. Concerns have also been developed when considering that larger trucks are used more for long-distance distribution.
Trucks are less sustainable than regular cars or smaller delivery vehicles and generate a higher rate of pollutants. In a peer-review article published by Elsevier, a study was conducted that researched the environmental impacts of E-commerce and the distribution methods that come with it. The article revealed that “since the trucks are relatively heavy emitters of NOx (with emissions 10 times those of a passenger car), the concentration of NOx could increase by as much as 24% due to e-commerce unless tailpipe emissions or truck technologies improve.”
Furthermore, pollution from vehicles is enlarged when considering consolidation methods. The same article additionally looked at the methods of choosing earlier delivery dates for cheaper or more expensive prices stating, “These services lead to lower consolidation levels, and therefore increase freight’s negative externalities.”
Overall, many of the environmental issues with e-commerce are linked to unsustainable distribution methods. While many of these methods are unsustainable, strides have been made to make them cleaner.
Recently, e-commerce corporations like Amazon have declared a commitment to shift their distribution fleet to electric vehicles and phase out combustion vehicles. Project drawdown looks at electric cars as a sustainable solution to auto travel, stating that “They are about 60 percent efficient compared to gasoline-powered vehicles.”
A cleaner outcome can be achieved by incorporating electric vehicles into distribution methods. Many companies are already working with electric vehicle companies to build electric trucks. Amazon has been working with Rivian, a new auto-electric company that is said to be developing alternatives to combustion delivery vehicles.
Other companies like Tesla have been putting money into developing electric semi-trucks that will have considerable environmental and performance gains compared to gas-powered trucks. In terms of the time frame to implementing these solutions, a 5-10 year gap should be expected as this is the time most major companies are giving themselves to become carbon neutral.
Overall, there are solutions to the environmental problems plaguing the e-commerce industry, but many of those solutions are years away from being fully implemented so for the time being the e-commerce industry will remain a major player in climate change. The best thing for people to do right now is to not prioritize next-day shipping and to try and consolidate packages or shop locally to reduce product travel.
-
Stop-and-Go: The Future of Freight Rail in Fort Collins and Beyond
By: Hannah Cantin
Fort Collins, Colo. — When I came to Fort Collins from Missouri, one of the first things I noticed was the trains. Sure, Columbia, Missouri has its fair share of roadway train crossings dotted throughout the city, but they’re only really the empty promise of trains – you never actually see any go by.
Fort Collins, on the other hand, sports three active lines, which frequently see freight trains roll in and out of town. But what are they? And what are they carrying?
Three different railroad companies have tracks and trains that run through the city: Burlington-Northern Santa Fe (or BNSF), Great Western, and Union Pacific. The BNSF, which passes by CSU’s campus as it runs parallel to College Boulevard, coins itself as “one of the top transporters of the products and materials that help feed, clothe, supply, and power communities throughout America.”
Their cars haul the likes of wheat and grains, produce, steel, coal, and vehicles – I’ve even seen pieces of passenger aircraft chugging along. Up until 2019, around 8 or so mile-long trains moved along the BNSF line in Fort Collins every day.
After that, the railroad began sending trains north through the city that were over twice as long. Most of us have probably seen, or at least heard the seemingly endless strings of empty coal cars running through town. You may have even seen them stop.
As trains run along the BNSF line, they may be forced to stop due to congestion on the tracks further north or in the switching yard. Even while running, the 3-mile-long trains can cause traffic stops of up to 15 minutes. When they stop, blockage times can persist for up to half an hour. Since the introduction of the BNSF line’s “double-trains” in 2019, the number of blockages lasting over 10 minutes has increased exponentially. They have even resulted in pedestrian deaths.
And this isn’t just happening in Fort Collins. By 2020, long trains and the blockages they cause had become such a frequent issue that the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) released its own online reporting tool, where citizens can make note of the duration, cause, and impact of traffic blockages.
At the time, then-FRA administrator Ronald Batory said that the data collected from the portal “[would] help [the FRA] identify where chronic problems exist”, but, even three years later, it is unlikely that rail transport through cities will slow down anytime soon – 28% of the US freight traveled by rail in 2020, after all. For better or worse, it is an indispensable industry for distribution. But that could all be very bad news for the environment – and the people.
While rail transport makes up only 2% of greenhouse gas emissions produced by the transportation sector, it is far from a clean industry. In the current age of rail transport, freight (and passenger) trains run largely on diesel fuel – far from their coal and steam-powered ancestry. They often transport volatile and toxic chemicals; to understand the potential threats of that, look no further than the recent Norfolk derailment in East Palestine, Ohio, which has released an obscene amount of smoking vinyl chloride into the environment, creating hazardous – if not impossible – living conditions, and killing over 43,000 aquatic animals.
The incident is nothing short of an environmental catastrophe and the probability of even more occurring can only increase as companies, politicians, and lobbying groups fight against labor reforms and safety regulations — like the an electric braking system that could have prevented the severity of the Norfolk derailment.
Clearly, something has to change. But since municipalities have no direct control over where and when rail lines run, it has to change up top. If we’re lucky, the almost mushroom-shaped cloud of toxic flame and disaster in East Palestine might be the one thing the railroad industry and federal government can’t sweep under the rug.
For the sake of underpaid, overworked rail workers, threatened wildlife, and the safety of communities like Fort Collins – where the risk of another Norfolk derailment runs through Old Town daily – I certainly hope it is.
-
Why you should look at Local Businesses when Deciding Where to Move
By: Audrey Brooks
Fort Collins, Colo. — When looking at a place to live, the local business scene doesn’t exactly top the list of what people look for. However, many people who live in a community that contains a lot of local businesses feel a stronger connection to their town and their neighbors through shopping with local businesses and overall having a better quality of life.
The question is how do local businesses improve your quality of life? Spending money even at a local store is still spending money, and for many Americans that is a stressful thing. I know I personally don’t like spending money.
However, when you go to a local business, or even better, a place with several local businesses together, you’re experiencing more than just buying stuff. You get to go out and make a connection with the people in your community. You can learn where your products come from, and if you do choose to buy something, you’re supporting your neighbors in achieving their goals.
So why should you live in Fort Collins? How do its local businesses compare to other places? Well for starters, Fort Collins, according to a study by RewardExpert, as of 2018 ranked 9th in the US for best places to start a small business.
A city that encourages its residents to own and manage small businesses is one that cares about its residents, by promoting healthy eating, sustainable living, and community connection through local businesses. To me, that’s a city worth living in.
So, maybe looking at local businesses isn’t necessarily a “must” when deciding where to live, but if you want to be part of a community, support local businesses, and overall have a better quality of life in your new city, take into consideration the local businesses in the area. Perhaps you’ll find just the place you’re looking for. Who knows? You could even end up in Fort Collins.
-
The Impact of Consumerism
By: Thalia Muniz
Fort Collins, Colo. — How Does Consumerism Affect Our Planet?
With the ever-growing market for just about anything, promoting consumerism has become the norm. We are told we need to buy the newest and greatest new product being released.
While having the newest products might make us happy, our planet cannot say the same for itself or many of the underrepresented workers.
While we use up our resources, we are also creating worse working conditions for people in less developed countries. The paper “The Lasting Impacts of Mass Consumerism and the Disposable Culture” discusses how overconsumption is ruining our Earth.
They state that single-use plastic bags have become one of the most harmful pollutants, particularly to marine life; the plastics are broken down into microplastics, which are then ingested by animals.
This is only one problem associated with overconsumption– there are hundreds more. We are stripping the Earth of its resources for our selfish needs. Although we have caused much damage to our ecosystems, there are ways to help.
What is Happening Around The Globe
Project Drawdown is a team of scientists whose mission is to help the world reach “drawdown” which is the point where emissions start to slow down and eventually start to steadily decrease.
One solution they have proposed that could help reduce the impact of consumerism is working on reducing plastics. Not only would this reduce the amount of waste on our streets and in our oceans, but it would actually be able to reduce 3-5 gigatons of carbon dioxide emissions released into our atmosphere.
What Fort Collins is Doing
Fort Collins has created and implemented many sustainability goals throughout the years. The following is a list of their goals that directly relate to reducing the impact of consumerism:
● Employees sustainably utilize products and services to maximize value and reduce the City’s overall consumption.
● City operations recycle and reduce the impacts of disposable waste.
● The City supports and fosters healthy, productive, and resilient employees.
While the impacts of overconsumption are catching up with us, we have come up with solutions to reduce the impact. Cities such as Fort Collins can serve as an example of how we can live sustainability without giving up our standard of living.
-
Worldwide Distribution and How Fort Collins Relates to It
By: Mateo Bandera
Fort Collins, Colo — The mass distribution of “stuff” throughout the globe is one of the most directly and indirectly hazardous systems in existence during modern times.
Every teddy bear, t-shirt, and grocery you have ever bought was likely made or grown thousands of miles away from you, then shipped in enormous cargo ships encompassing three football fields in length alone, crossing the ocean for months at a time, all to meet the ever-growing demand of the consumers, us.
At first glance, there doesn’t seem to be anything wrong with how we get all our “stuff.” People work in factories to make things, and then those things get shipped to wherever they’re needed, right? Yes, but it’s when you look closer that the thinly-made wall crafted by all the people who profit from this system crumbles away.
Extreme environmental damage is a result of constant CO2 emissions being pumped into the air from factories and vehicles alike. Social and cultural destruction, with organizations like the WTC casually displacing thousands of people at a time in order to increase trade. And even complete ecological breakdowns and the subsequent re-molding of foreign nations, for example, Haiti, which has been pressured into becoming what is essentially a personal workshop for people in the U.S.
But how does Fort Collins rate when it comes to its distribution practices? Well, I‘m happy to say that, at least comparatively, Fort Collins is pretty dang good.
First of all, Fort Collins is a carbon-neutral city, a measurement that includes the daily Target trucks and Walmart shipments. And in addition to that, it is very friendly towards local suppliers and restaurant owners. Eating locally reduces all the negative effects of transporting products drastically, while also fostering a tight-night social community. And Fort Collins has more than its share of locally-owned restaurants and markets.
That doesn’t mean that Fort Collins is perfect, of course, there are plenty of non-local stores too. But as of right now, FoCo is a leader in environmental and human sustainability, especially when it comes to product distribution.
-
An Analytical Response on Consumption in America and how Economic Status Further Exemplifies the Issues
By: Sasha Levy
Fort Collins, Colo. — The U.S. is considered to have the world’s “largest economy” primarily because of its capitalistic system and culture of entrepreneurship. Another is because of the vast amount of over-consumption present, although consumption is necessary to survive the drastic amounts of over-consumerism can be attributed to the U.S.’s capitalistic system and the need to sustain their large economy.
The United States is a country that upholds a different government system than most other countries in the world. With its combination of the capitalistic system and consumer society, it produces “more per person than most other advanced economies” which leads to the consumption of more products that majority of the time are unnecessary.
A key example of consumerism sustained by the American system at its finest is the holiday Black Friday, a day when huge discounts are placed on massive amounts of items and are usually when people start shopping for themselves and the holidays.
This holiday furthers the beliefs in a consumer society, valuing the “acquiring and possession of material objects which leads to the belief that possessions can make us happy,” stated an Article on Consumerism by Lage, C., Lins, S., & Aquino, S.
The Story of Stuff by Annie Leonard discusses the absurdity of Black Friday. Families leaving their “Thanksgiving dinners early to sleep in the store parking lots hours before scheduled store openings,” only to then trample the workers and anyone else who may get in their way just to get the items that are on sale, which they could honestly live without.
America’s promotion of a consumer society allows them to maintain their large participation in the global economy but also leads to massive consequences on the environment as well as the bodies of everyone in the U.S.
In 2022, Americans spent a total of around $14 Billion per quarter (roughly $56 Billion a year) on consumer goods alone. The amount that Americans spent on consumer goods is more than half the amount of money the government budgeted for the Department of Education, budgeting $90 Billion for the department, increasing by 10.3% from the year prior. I
It is believed that consumer spending accounts for roughly 30% of the U.S. economy, meaning that those in power in the government will never want to end consumerism as the US isn’t fully reliant on it but the belief that “the bigger the better” is entirely engrained into our consumer society.
Although consumerism and over-consumerism are extremely beneficial for our economy, it leaves a prominent issue that people have tried to ignore for years.
The sheer amount of waste that is produced from consumerism is massive, as they are directly correlated, the more goods that are produced the more waste will be produced, continuing to build up as we have no sustainable ways to deal with said waste.
In 2022 alone, 292 million tons of waste was generated, with 146 million tons of waste discarded and added to the numerous landfills in the US, with each landfill having an estimated 150K tons of waste already in them.
Being in a consumer society is harmful to the environment but also to our own bodies. The constant advertising of cheap, fast and easy foods leads to an increase in weight.
The obesity rate in the US continues to increase year by year, according to the CDC’s research “the US obesity prevalence was 41.9% in 2020” and “the prevalence of severe obesity increased from 4.7% to 9.2%.”
Advertising plays a large role in consumerism, with advertising being a flashy way to influence someone’s decisions, such as subconsciously thinking about buying a product and how it would potentially help.
This same thing applies to fast food chains such as Mcdonald’s, Wendy’s and Burger King. By using flashy advertisements to show their
absurdly cheap foods, like the Wendy’s 4 for $4 which has a burger, fries, chicken nuggets and a drink for an insanely cheap price, which entices someone to go eat there, especially if they’re a low-income family that might not be able to afford groceries to make a proper meal at home.
Another bad thing about fast-food and advertising is the amount of energy and resources used to sustain all the livestock. In Project Drawdown, Hawken stated that “raising livestock accounts for nearly 15% of global greenhouse gases emitted each year” with more “comprehensive assessments of direct and indirect emissions say more than 50%.”
To conclude, the U.S. has continued to stay on top of the global economy, being the top player in it. Although not completely reliant on it, the US’s economy is as high as it is because of the capitalistic and consumer-focused society we live in.
One that pushes for material gains to show one’s status and value. Because of how consumerism is ingrained into our life system to the point that most people block it out like white noise, over-consumerism won’t be slowing down in the United States anytime soon. Especially because it continues to make the U.S. money and keep it high on the global economy leaderboard.